Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- 360 degree Feedback (1)
- Abusive Supervision (1)
- Assessment Center (1)
- Burnout (1)
- Case-Study (1)
- Evidence-based Management (1)
- Feldstudie (1)
- Leadership Competencies (1)
- Mastery Experience (1)
- Mediatoranalyse (1)
Impact of Team Members’ Competence on the Development of Team Mental Models and Team Performance
(2011)
This paper makes a contribution to the discussion on microfoundations of dynamic capabilities – actions and interactions in organizations that enable continuous organizational renewal. More specifically, we propose the idea that dynamic capabilities of an organization
are a positive function of corresponding dynamic capabilities of individual and collective actors in the organization. Further, we develop the assumption that not only individual acts of managers but also of individuals and teams without managerial responsibility relate to dynamic capabilities of the organization. Following a holistic view, we also take into consideration empowering working conditions as enhancing factor of this function. To
examine these roots of dynamic capabilities, we use a multi level model of competence provided by Wilkens, Keller and Schmette (2006) that operationalizes the concept of dynamic
capabilities provided by Teece (2007) on a concisely behavioural base. We investigated our hypotheses with a standardized questionnaire in a case study of a German plant engineering company with 112 participants and found first support for our assumptions. Our results show an impact of individual dynamic capabilities on dynamic capabilities of the organization which is mediated by team dynamic capabilities. Psychological and social-structural empowerment moderated this relationship. A case-specific interpretation and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Psychological Capital as Mediator between Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Performance
(2013)
Moderating Role of Self-control Strength with Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Performance
(2013)
Based on a longitudinal sample of employees from the U.S. financial services industry (N=121), the present research examined the impact of transformational leadership on followers’ adaptive performance in change processes. Follower personality was taken into account as boundary condition by testing, if follower self-control strength as an individual trait moderated the relationship between transformational leadership and adaptive performance. In line with the developed hypothesis, results from a latent moderated structural equation model showed that followers’ self-control strength attenuated the relationship between transformational leadership and adaptive performance. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
We argue that effective leadership development should be evidence-based, i.e. that it combines the best available scientific evidence with
research in the specific organizational context. To illustrate our proposition, we report findings from a case study in a multinational organization. The goal was to examine which rater source in the company’s 360 degree feedback would provide the most valid information about leadership competencies. Therefore, we explored relationships between 360 degree ratings and assessment center (AC) ratings of the same leadership competencies (N=151). It was predicted that AC ratings show higher overlap with 360 degree ratings for behaviors that specific rating
sources can more easily observe in the ratees’ work life. Results showed that peers were the most accurate observers of leadership competencies in 360 degree assessments, compared to managers and subordinates. This corroborates our argument for an evidence-based instead of an
intuitive handling of 360 degree feedback results. Practical implications and avenues for future research are discussed.
Psychologisches Kapital als Konzept der positiven Organisationspsychologie beschreibt individuelle Ressourcen, die ausschlaggebend sind für ausgeprägtes Leistungsverhalten und hohe Zufriedenheit am Arbeitsplatz. Die positiven Konsequenzen dieses Konstrukts für Organisationen sind dank zahlreicher Untersuchungen bekannt. Weit weniger ist aber bekannt, wie diese psychologische Ressource und positive Interventionen, die sich eignen, um das psychologische Kapital von Mitarbeitern und Führungskräften zu stärken und damit ihre Leistungsfähigkeit und Zufriedenheit zu fördern, gezielt im Coaching eingesetzt werden können.
Die kognitive Distanzierung von Arbeitsinhalten wahrend der arbeitsfreien Zeit (psychological detachment) stellt einen wichtigen Faktor für Erholung, Wohlbefinden und andauernde
Leistungsfähigkeit von Beschäftigten dar. Die Antezedenzien von mentalem Abschalten nach der Arbeit sind jedoch bisweilen nur unzureichend untersucht worden; dies gilt insbesondere für Variablen im unmittelbaren Arbeitsumfeld von Mitarbeitern. Was können Organisationen tun, um das mentale Abschalten ihrer Mitarbeiter in der Freizeit zu fordern? Basierend auf einer Kombination aus dem Stressor–Detachment Model und der Theorie der Ressourcenerhaltung gehen wir davon aus, dass Servant Leadership als Prädiktor von mentalem Abschalten nach der Arbeit betrachtet werden kann, welches sich wiederum positiv auf freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement (Organizational Citizenship Behavior), auswirkt. Die Hypothesen testen wir mittels Querschnittsdesign mit N = 121 Mitarbeitern eines Technologiekonzerns. Es werden Zeitintervalle zwischen den Erhebungszeitpunkten sowie Fremdbeurteilungen eingesetzt, um das Risiko von Methodenverzerrung zu minimieren. Die Ergebnisse eines Strukturgleichungsmodells zeigen hypothesenkonform, dass mentales Abschalten nach der Arbeit den Zusammenhang zwischen Servant Leadership und freiwilligem Arbeitsengagement teilweise mediiert. Implikationen für die Praxis und Ansatzpunkte für zukünftige Forschungsarbeiten werden diskutiert.
Für die Schattenseiten der Führungspersönlichkeit gibt es zahlreiche aktuelle Beispiele. Eine gute Systematisierung subklinischer Persönlichkeitszüge stammt von Paulhus und Williams, die den Begriff der dunklen Triade geprägt und damit einen wichtigen Anstoß für die wirtschaftspsychologische Forschung gegeben haben. Hier setzen wir an und skizzieren die zentralen Fragen, die unsere Monographie beantworten soll.
Purpose
Although courage has generally been understood as a powerful virtue, research to establish it as a psychological construct is in its infancy. We examined courage in organizations against the backdrop of positive psychology with a design in the Grounded Theory tradition that connects Positive Organizational Behavior and Positive Organizational Scholarship.
Method
The sample consists of organizations that define courage in their mission statement and organizations without such a definition. It includes employees and executives, exploring workplace courage on the macro as well as the micro level. Eleven organizations and 23 participants contributed to the interview study.
Results
Applying Glaser's theoretical coding, specifically the C-family, we propose that courage arises from a decisional conflict in three major domains: the self, social interaction, and performance. It is located on a continuum between apathy and foolhardiness and can take on reactive, proactive, or autonomous forms. Whether and to what extent courage manifests, is a dynamic process contingent upon organizational structure, culture, and communication climate as well as individual cognitiveaffective personality systems.
Limitations
The model depicts the complexity of the phenomenon, rather than details of its individual components. It goes beyond pre-defined categories and prevailing definitions.
Implications
Modern organizations are characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA).
Courage is crucial in such an environment and can be systematically fostered across the whole human
resource management cycle.
Value
The study advances theory building on courage in the workplace and highlights its potential to be
measured, developed and managed for more effective work performance.
Purpose
Although the systemic approach to the leadership concept seems to fit well into our modern complex and dynamic work environment, only little research has been conducted to define and assess systemic leadership. In this study we therefore developed and assessed criterion validity of the
multidimensional systemic leadership inventory (SLI, Sülzenbrück & Externbrink, 2017).
Methodology
We conducted two cross-sectional survey among managers and employees of various organizations (N = 143 and N = 150).
Results
We found a robust five-factor structure of the SLI, comprising systemic thinking, self-knowledge, solution-oriented communication, creating meaning and delegation. Regarding criterion validity, a significant positive correlation of systemic leadership was found with affective commitment, while a significant negative correlation with emotional strain in occupational contexts occurred. These overall positive outcomes for employees were not undermined by negative personality traits of the employee (Machiavellianism), while strong growth need strength further enhanced positive effects on affective commitment.
Limitations
Since all variables were measured as self-reports, common method variance could limit our findings.
Practical Implications
Systemic leadership is a very promising new approach for leaders to ensure committed and less strained employees.
Value
Systemic leadership, especially in terms of a leaders’ understanding of organizational and private systems influencing work behaviour of all members of an organization, is a promising novel leadership model suitable to address challenges of complex and dynamic work environments.
Purpose
So far, there are several approaches of measuring the Dark Triad traits, but still all of them are
personality questionnaires with at least questionable usability for applied contexts such as Human
Resource Management.
The purpose of the study is the development of a structured interview with the aim of measuring the Dark Triad in a rather qualitative way that increases social validity for the respondents.
Design/Methodology/Approach/Intervention
In the present study, 15 executives from the telecommunications industry were interviewed on their personal evaluation of management success and derailment. Afterwards, their personality traits of the Dark Triad were measured with the help of the Short Dark Triad Scale. Subsequently, the data from qualitative and quantitative research were examined for correlations using the mixed-method approach.
Results
The results of the mixed-method approach showed a statistically significant correlation between the Short Dark Triad Scale and the ratings for narcissism, Machiavellianism and subclinical psychopathy in the Dark Triad interview.
Limitations
Replicating the results in a bigger sample and a deeper investigation of the criterion-related validity as well as an integration of multiple raters can provide more confidence in our results.
Research/Practical Implications
Structured interviews allow the measurement of personality traits in a more convenient way especially in personnel selection and development processes. Identifying subclinical traits in leadership candidates can, e.g. prevent management derailment.
Originality/Value
The present study advances the measurement methods of the Dark Triad.