Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- 360 degree Feedback (1)
- Abusive Supervision (1)
- Assessment Center (1)
- Burnout (1)
- Case-Study (1)
- Evidence-based Management (1)
- Feldstudie (1)
- Leadership Competencies (1)
- Mastery Experience (1)
- Mediatoranalyse (1)
- Servant Leadership (1)
- academic and job-related self-control demands (1)
- antecedents (1)
- compassionate love (1)
- diagnostics, Big Five, Dark Triad, social validity, acceptance (1)
- dynamic capabilities (1)
- empowerment (1)
- freiwilliges Arbeitsengagement (1)
- irritation (1)
- managerial vs. non-managerial actors (1)
- mentales Abschalten nach der Arbeit (1)
- microfoundations (1)
- multi-level model of competence (1)
- narcissism (1)
- servant leadership (1)
- study and working time per week (1)
- trait self-control (1)
Theoretischer Hintergrund: Mut ist ein bislang wenig erforschtes Konstrukt. In der Forschung existieren unterschiedliche Betrachtungsweisen und Annahmen, u.a. hinsichtlich der Art des Konstruktes oder der Einflussfaktoren. Es existieren zudem, insbesondere im deutschsprachigen Raum, nur wenige Instrumente zur Messung von Mut. Diese zeigen zudem oftmals verbesserungsfähige oder unzureichende psychometrische Gütekriterien.
Fragestellung: Auf Basis einer umfangreichen Literaturrecherche ist unser Ziel, neben einem wissenschaftlichen Beitrag zur Klärung des Konstruktes, einen Selbstbeschreibungsfragebogen zur Messung von Mut im Arbeitskontext zu konstruieren, welcher den gängigen psychometrischen Gütekriterien entspricht und perspektivisch im Rahmen der Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung eingesetzt werden könnte.
Methodik: Der Erstentwurf des Selbstbeschreibungsfragebogens zu Mut im Arbeitskontext besteht aus den Dimensionen sozialer Mut und persönlicher Mut. Zur psychometrischen Überprüfung des Fragebogenentwurfs haben wir eine Querschnittstudie in Form einer Online-Befragung durchgeführt (N = 253). Der Fokus lag auf der Itemanalyse, sowie auf der Überprüfung der Reliabilität und der Validität.
Ergebnisse: Die Reliabilität beträgt α = .92 und α = .91. Die exploratorische Faktorenanalyse stützt das 2-Faktoren-Modell. Es existieren erwartungsgemäß signifikante positive Korrelationen mit inhaltsähnlichen Konstrukten, u.a. arbeitsplatzbezogene Selbstwirksamkeit oder Extraversion und negative signifikante Korrelationen zu Neurotizismus und Psychopathie. Zusätzlich zeigen Mittelwertsvergleiche für
Geschlecht und Führungsverantwortung Ergebnisse gemäß dem aktuellen Stand der Forschung.
Diskussion Der Selbstbeschreibungsfragebogen zeigt klares Potenzial für die Nutzung im Rahmen der Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung. Im Rahmen der Fragebogenkonstruktion ist es entscheidend das Konstrukt so eng wie möglich einzugrenzen. Die Fokussierung auf eine spezifische Form von
Mut scheint der Schlüssel zu sein, um ein den gängigen Anforderungen an psychometrische Gütekriterien entsprechendes Instrument zu entwickeln.
Psychological Capital as Mediator between Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Performance
(2013)
Purpose
So far, there are several approaches of measuring the Dark Triad traits, but still all of them are
personality questionnaires with at least questionable usability for applied contexts such as Human
Resource Management.
The purpose of the study is the development of a structured interview with the aim of measuring the Dark Triad in a rather qualitative way that increases social validity for the respondents.
Design/Methodology/Approach/Intervention
In the present study, 15 executives from the telecommunications industry were interviewed on their personal evaluation of management success and derailment. Afterwards, their personality traits of the Dark Triad were measured with the help of the Short Dark Triad Scale. Subsequently, the data from qualitative and quantitative research were examined for correlations using the mixed-method approach.
Results
The results of the mixed-method approach showed a statistically significant correlation between the Short Dark Triad Scale and the ratings for narcissism, Machiavellianism and subclinical psychopathy in the Dark Triad interview.
Limitations
Replicating the results in a bigger sample and a deeper investigation of the criterion-related validity as well as an integration of multiple raters can provide more confidence in our results.
Research/Practical Implications
Structured interviews allow the measurement of personality traits in a more convenient way especially in personnel selection and development processes. Identifying subclinical traits in leadership candidates can, e.g. prevent management derailment.
Originality/Value
The present study advances the measurement methods of the Dark Triad.
Purpose
Although the systemic approach to the leadership concept seems to fit well into our modern complex and dynamic work environment, only little research has been conducted to define and assess systemic leadership. In this study we therefore developed and assessed criterion validity of the
multidimensional systemic leadership inventory (SLI, Sülzenbrück & Externbrink, 2017).
Methodology
We conducted two cross-sectional survey among managers and employees of various organizations (N = 143 and N = 150).
Results
We found a robust five-factor structure of the SLI, comprising systemic thinking, self-knowledge, solution-oriented communication, creating meaning and delegation. Regarding criterion validity, a significant positive correlation of systemic leadership was found with affective commitment, while a significant negative correlation with emotional strain in occupational contexts occurred. These overall positive outcomes for employees were not undermined by negative personality traits of the employee (Machiavellianism), while strong growth need strength further enhanced positive effects on affective commitment.
Limitations
Since all variables were measured as self-reports, common method variance could limit our findings.
Practical Implications
Systemic leadership is a very promising new approach for leaders to ensure committed and less strained employees.
Value
Systemic leadership, especially in terms of a leaders’ understanding of organizational and private systems influencing work behaviour of all members of an organization, is a promising novel leadership model suitable to address challenges of complex and dynamic work environments.
Purpose
Although courage has generally been understood as a powerful virtue, research to establish it as a psychological construct is in its infancy. We examined courage in organizations against the backdrop of positive psychology with a design in the Grounded Theory tradition that connects Positive Organizational Behavior and Positive Organizational Scholarship.
Method
The sample consists of organizations that define courage in their mission statement and organizations without such a definition. It includes employees and executives, exploring workplace courage on the macro as well as the micro level. Eleven organizations and 23 participants contributed to the interview study.
Results
Applying Glaser's theoretical coding, specifically the C-family, we propose that courage arises from a decisional conflict in three major domains: the self, social interaction, and performance. It is located on a continuum between apathy and foolhardiness and can take on reactive, proactive, or autonomous forms. Whether and to what extent courage manifests, is a dynamic process contingent upon organizational structure, culture, and communication climate as well as individual cognitiveaffective personality systems.
Limitations
The model depicts the complexity of the phenomenon, rather than details of its individual components. It goes beyond pre-defined categories and prevailing definitions.
Implications
Modern organizations are characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA).
Courage is crucial in such an environment and can be systematically fostered across the whole human
resource management cycle.
Value
The study advances theory building on courage in the workplace and highlights its potential to be
measured, developed and managed for more effective work performance.